Category: Interviews

Cate Blanchett covers Interview Magazine March 2019 issue

Cate Blanchett covers Interview Magazine March 2019 issue

Hey Blanchetters!

The first magazine cover and photoshoot of 2019 have arrived! Cate looks amazing!
Cate Blanchett is on the cover of the new issue of Interview Magazine and with a brand new interview by fellow actress Julia Roberts. Take a look!

The Inimitable Cate Blanchett Asks Julia Roberts the Timeless Question: Is Enough Enough?

Cate Blanchett does not play nice. Her performances almost always hinge on the unhinged. Although she is nothing if not regal—audiences will forever remember her as Queen Elizabeth I, a part that earned her the first of her seven Oscar nominations—Blanchett has never backed away from malice and mania, or what she describes as the “King Lear end of the spectrum.” The 49-year-old Australian actress has stalked down the darker corridors of human complexity by inhabiting a sexually repressed housewife in Carol, a shrill and martini-drowned socialite in Blue Jasmine, and, most recently, an agoraphobic architect in Richard Linklater’s adaptation of the Maria Semple novel Where’d You Go, Bernadette, out later this year. And yet, from a hotel room near London’s National Theatre, where she has been taking the stage in a production of When We Have Sufficiently Tortured Each Other, Blanchett wonders whether enough is enough. From across the ocean, at home in Los Angeles, Julia Roberts helps her grapple with the answer.

———

JULIA ROBERTS: Hello, Queen Cate.

CATE BLANCHETT: Hello, movie star. You want to know something? We just had your film Ben Is Back on, I kid you not. It made me cry after five minutes. And then, being totally brain-dead, I suddenly thought, “What day is it?” An alarm went off in my head, and I went, “I’ve got to go talk to that actress lady!”

ROBERTS: You want to talk about being brain-dead? I’ve had the craziest day. I woke up sick, and I was at Urgent Care for an hour and a half with one of my son’s friends who cut his foot when he was surfing. He got eight stitches.

BLANCHETT: You are a good friend. I’ve just had a half-bottle of red after a rather challenging day of rehearsal for a play I’m doing at the National Theatre [When We Have Sufficiently Tortured Each Other]. As you get older, acting just gets more and more humiliating. When I was younger, I would wonder why the older actors I admired kept talking about quitting. Now I realize it’s because they want to maintain a connection to the last shreds of their sanity. As I get older, I ask myself if I still want to submit myself to the shamanistic end of this profession and go completely into madness. It’s the King Lear end of the spectrum of what we do, right? So I’m on the proverbial couch thinking, “Do I want to go that direction, or do I actually want to live a life?”

ROBERTS: The great thing about doing theater is that there’s never really a “This is it” moment. There’s that alchemy every night.

BLANCHETT: And I certainly love that alchemy as an audience member.

ROBERTS: What are you up to right now?

BLANCHETT: At the moment I’m thinking, “Where do the radical ideas actually exist?” I gravitate toward museums and galleries but often they tend to speak predominantly to audiences that have time to go into that quietude. There are such large sections of our communities that don’t have the time because they’re working two or three jobs. But what I love about those things is that they get to deal with abstract ideas. We get so used to these narrative structures, but there are certain ideas that don’t fit into that slot, so I’m finding my work with visual artists or choreographers more rewarding at the moment than the cookie-cutter projects.

ROBERTS: For someone like you, it probably has to do with the fact that you have accomplished so many things on such an incredibly creative level.

BLANCHETT: Maybe it’s just time to stop.

ROBERTS: Stop saying that.

BLANCHETT: No, but it really is. I have to go onstage in my underwear yet again, and I’m thinking, “Why? Why don’t I just feed the chickens and read Proust?” It’s on my bookshelf staring at me right now. All these volumes I have purchased and not yet read. Why have I not picked those up? Why am I still bothering to make movies? Why do you make movies?

ROBERTS: They call to me.

BLANCHETT: Is it a response to someone else’s idea of who you might be?

ROBERTS: I think the first time that Danny [Moder, Roberts’s husband] and I worked together after we were married was the first time that I suddenly thought, “Oh my gosh, what I do for a living is so silly. I’m calling myself a different name. I’m wearing somebody else’s clothes. And I’m basically playing pretend on a huge scale.” I had never been so self-conscious until I was suddenly doing it in front of my husband, thinking, “What must he think?”

BLANCHETT: When you’re so inside a richly lived life, you suddenly think, “Do I need to pretend to live inside these other experiences?” When you have a richly lived experience, you can empathetically extrapolate out from there. That’s what women like Rachel Cusk and Maggie Nelson do in their writing. And that’s where I found Bernadette. I recognized something very deeply about a creative life that shuts down.

ROBERTS: And yet, you want to stay home and feed the chickens.

BLANCHETT: I’m quite happy sitting here looking at my unread Proust, talking to you and feeding my pigs. I was a vegetarian for years when my husband wanted to get pigs. I said, “I’ll get pigs as long as we tell the kids that the sausages and bacon they eat are from our pigs.” We called them Benson and Hedges.

ROBERTS: You can’t name something that you’re going to kill. That’s the number-one rule of being a farmer.

BLANCHETT: [Laughs.]

ROBERTS: And now they’re in the freezer.

BLANCHETT: It was this Machiavellian vegetarian plan that I had for my kids, that they would form this deep connection with the piglets, which were very cute and smelled kind of like smelly people. And then I would tell them that if we eat sausages, they’re coming from these pigs. The kids were just totally fine with that and I was horrified. My plan to turn my family vegetarian was a monumental failure.

ROBERTS: What type of roles do you automatically turn down? Is there such a thing?

BLANCHETT: When I feel like it’s a pre-masticated version of something I’ve already done? Like a margarine commercial, where the agency thinks, “This worked before, so, hey, let’s do it again!” After I played Queen Elizabeth, I got offered myriad roles that were basically the same story with a different costume. There was no potential for discovering anything new. There’s no risk.

ROBERTS: In Where’d You Go, Bernadette, you play the spouse of Billy Crudup, one of my favorite actors and someone who played my spouse in a film [Eat Pray Love].

BLANCHETT: We worked together years ago on a film in France called Charlotte Gray. He’s so open and egoless. As we all know, that is rare in a male actor. How many times have you and I said, “That’s a great role—I’m not the lead, but the male lead is a great actor and I’d really love to be a part of this project”? Invert that, and you don’t have a lot of men who would come to the party in the same way for a woman. Billy is one of those guys who says yes. It’s rare that you get an actor of his caliber who is prepared to play the so-called “husband role.” The best thing for me about this post–[Harvey] Weinstein era is the opportunity to learn from it. We can change the structure, to have horizontal conversations rather than hierarchical ones. That’s a matriarchy. I think the opportunity here is to reinvent the power structure so that it is genuinely more inclusive. It’s not about competition—it’s about collaboration.

ROBERTS: You’re incredible. Honestly, I could sit and just listen to you talk about things for hours.

BLANCHETT: I wish I were interviewing you. It feels a little like a veil has been lifted, and we’re talking to one another in a muscular way about stuff that we’ve had to deal with. We can all pretend that we live in a community, but we actually live in a capitalist environment and our worth is being measured in dollars. It’s a really boring conversation to have because when you talk about the creative industry, it’s always seen as, “Well, you’re famous. You’ve got the opportunity to do this, and now you’re being greedy to talk about money.” But you’re not. You’re talking about really practical things such as residuals, producing credits, insurance. In the end, you’re actually talking about status. And status opens doors, whether you’re in the banking sector or the film industry or whatever. They’re not attractive conversations. They’re not conversations that women are traditionally meant to have because we’re expected to be more demure, but there are certainly robust “masculine” compensations that are had by our male counterparts, so why shouldn’t we be a part of that dialogue?

ROBERTS: Do you have a nickname?

BLANCHETT: Maybe it should be Blabbermouth? Sometimes my husband calls me Poss, like possum. Do you have one?

ROBERTS: When my kids’ friends were little, they couldn’t say Julia, because it’s a lot of syllables, so they’d call me Juju. They still call me that.

BLANCHETT: That is really sweet. You are such a mensch.

ROBERTS: Juju and Poss, a love story.

———


Source

Cate Blanchett for Giorgio Armani: New Interview and Documentary

Cate Blanchett for Giorgio Armani: New Interview and Documentary

Good morning Blanchetters! The collaboration between Cate and Mr. Armani is bearing fruits into the new year, with lovely new contents. At the end of 2018 the fashion maison released a new set of interviews by the title What is Armani for you?


Source

Few day ago Armani releaved that a new documentary called Armani Privè: A View Beyond was set to premiere on the italian channel Sky Arte on January 16 (Italian Title: Armani Privè – Lo sguardo oltre)

Here is the trailer:


Both videos were recored is September when Cate attended the Milan Fashion Week. Pictures in the gallery here
Talking about Giorgio Armani, Armani Beauty has started releasing the new spring commercials these days: according to online stores the new fragrance is called Sì Fiori Eau de Parfum. Sources: 1, 2

New Interview | Cate Blanchett: ‘I see theatre as a provocation’

New Interview | Cate Blanchett: ‘I see theatre as a provocation’

Hello Blanchetters!!

Who’s ready to see Cate’s debut at the National Theatre in London?
Here’s the first interview about When We Have Sufficiently Tortured Each Other opening on 16 January.
You can read it on the scans or below. Enjoy!

Click on the image to download from the gallery

Click on the image to download from the gallery

Cate Blanchett strides into the room and plomps herself down on the sofa. In front of us – this is meant to be lunch – a table is piled high with sandwiches, fruit, salads and a copy of the script she has spent all morning rehearsing. She prods at it with a finger, hooting with laughter. “Any pointers?” she asks. I glance across at the other sofa, where Martin Crimp, the playwright, is settling himself in. He gazes back impassively. This might be a joke; it might not.

We’re backstage at the National Theatre to discuss Blanchett’s appearance in Crimp’s new play – her debut here, and her first appearance on the London stage in seven years. Also squeezing on to the sofas are Blanchett’s director, Katie Mitchell, and her co-star Stephen Dillane. To call the production hotly anticipated is something of an undersell: demand for tickets was so high that the theatre was forced to introduce a Hamilton-style ballot (a few day tickets are left, if you’re able to queue). Even from the vantage point of not-quite-mid-January, this looks like being one of the biggest plays of the year.

Working out what kind of play Crimp has come up with, however, is trickier, as Blanchett and her colleagues readily admit. Entitled When We Have Sufficiently Tortured Each Other, it is – at least on paper – a loose adaptation of Samuel Richardson’s 1740 proto-novel Pamela. Relating the story of a young maidservant’s relationship with her employer, the book scandalised readers when it was first published. Composed of a series of letters in which Pamela relates how she is pursued by the mysterious “Mr B”, then sexually assaulted, it ends with her finally (and apparently enthusiastically) agreeing to marry him. It’s been called everything from tawdry S&M to a set of case notes for Stockholm syndrome.

“It’s an archetypal story: Beauty and the Beast,” says Crimp. “Or, to be more blunt, predator and prey.”

In the play, the problems of the novel are sharpened. Although the characters played by Blanchett and Dillane often resemble Pamela and Mr B, at other times they seem to blur into each other, or transform into other people entirely. At the play’s opening, the scenario seems grimly clear: Mr B is a bullying despot, Pamela his cowering victim. A few scenes in, however – there are 12 in all, each responding to a different fragment or aspect of the novel – the ground has begun to shift. Images of voyeurism and violence proliferate: is the audience being challenged, titillated, or both? Is, in fact, the woman controlling her master, rather than the other way around?

Dillane says: “There’s a line in the play, ‘I took you – against your will – was it against your will? – jury’s out.’” He pauses. “That’s the question: who’s doing what to whom?”

The script reminds Blanchett of the boundary-breaking writers Rachel Cusk and Maggie Nelson: “A lot of the things the play brings up is stuff I’ve been thinking about for a long time. The boundaries of gender, how language constantly fails us and confines us, keeps us in paradigms and frameworks which are frustrating and confounding.”

Mitchell doesn’t want to reveal too much about what audiences will see when the lights go down – “That’s a spoiler!” she laughs – but says the production will be set in the present day, not a periwig or petticoat in sight. “No Downton Abbey,” she adds, in case anyone was expecting it.

[…]

As a stage actor, too, Blanchett has been eager to take chances. In 2006, she put a burgeoning movie career on ice to move back to Australia and run Sydney Theatre Company with her husband, the playwright-screenwriter Andrew Upton. Though Blanchett stepped down from the co-directorship in 2012, she appeared opposite Isabelle Huppert in STC’s production of Genet’s The Maids and made her Broadway debut in 2017 in Upton’s version of Chekhov’s Platonov.

The last time she was in London, it was in another Crimp text – a translation of the German playwright Botho Strauss’s Big and Small. It offered a white-knuckle portrait of a woman disintegrating before our eyes – one second happily gossiping and flirting, the next keening and clawing the floor in anguish.

How on earth does she decide which roles will suit her? “If you read a work and you know what it is, I don’t know why you’d bother rehearsing it,” she replies crisply. “You always have to risk failure. The more recognisable you are, the more expectation there is around you, the harder it is to carve out that space. But you have to.”

Being among artists who challenge her is a powerful attraction, she adds, which is partly why this particular project was a no-brainer: “I’m not going to lock myself in a room for my own enjoyment or pain. The process is really important.”

I’m wondering how she and her colleagues are approaching the wider politics of this play about the relationship between a predatory, all-powerful man and a woman being employed as a sexual plaything. British theatre was quick to channel the impulses of the #MeToo movement, at least on stage. Blanchett has often spoken about the issue, and pursued it doggedly when she chaired the jury at last year’s Cannes festival.

Crimp points out that he began sketching the script three years ago. But Mitchell says, for her, the play can’t really be about anything else, at least right now. “Of course we think about it. It’s a very live environment at the moment. It would be impossible not to.”

Blanchett is nodding passionately. “You make a piece for the time you’re in, otherwise it’s not relevant. What’s the point of doing it?”

So how do they think audiences might respond? “I always see theatre as a provocation,” she says. “You’re not up there running for office, you’re asking a series of questions. Some people might be enraged, some perplexed, some people might be excited. Hopefully it’s the conversation afterwards that’s the most important.”

Behind the scenes in British theatre, there seems to be a new determination to correct age-old imbalances: gender-equal and ethnically diverse casts, more plays written and directed by women, more awareness that theatre actually needs to look like the world that surrounds it. Do they feel things are finally starting to change?

Mitchell looks faintly weary. “For me, it’s hard. I feel like I’ve been telling these stories for, like, 30 years. I think the whole thing started before it started, if that makes sense.”

She adds: “It’s like #MeToo was the boiling point. It’s been simmering a long time.”

How about Blanchett, given that she moves so freely between the film and theatre worlds? Like Mitchell, she was talking about so many of these issues long before they became daily headlines.

She looks ruminative: I sense a reluctance to give too pat an answer. “We’re still in the process where the rage is bubbling up,” she suggests eventually, then gestures around her. “But when I come to a theatre company like this, I can feel it inside the building. Inclusion isn’t just box-ticking, it’s opening new ways of making work, new types of work.”
[…]

Read Full text here

Wanna meet some fans going to London? Join CBF Chat now!

News: Magazine Scans+Interviews + Behind the Scene Picture + More

News: Magazine Scans+Interviews + Behind the Scene Picture + More

Hello Blanchetters!

It has been a quiet week considering how busy Cate has been for the last few weeks. Today we are posting content released during the week; first IndieWire released an interview with greek director Yorgos Lanthimos, who confessed Cate has reached out and wants to work with him. Maybe this is Cate’s next big collaboration? We’ll see! Meanwhile, here’s a fragment of the interview:

But there’s one major actor who has been eager to work with Lanthimos long before he made inroads to English-language productions. “Cate Blanchett was the first one that reached out,” Lanthimos said, in an interview with IndieWire from New York, while promoting the upcoming release of “The Favourite” and recalling the immediate aftermath of “Dogtooth.” “I’m still in contact with Cate, and we are trying to do something together.”
Blanchett has yet to speak publicly of her affinity for Lanthimos’ work, and representatives for the actress declined to comment. Nevertheless, a collaboration with Lanthimos would be a natural gamble for the A-list performer, whose stable of auteur collaborators includes Woody Allen, Terrence Malick, Todd Haynes, and Martin Scorsese. Lanthimos and Blanchett have overlapped at festivals in recent years: “The Lobster” was in competition at Cannes the same year as Haynes’ “Carol,” and Blanchett was spotted at the Venice International Film Festival premiere of “The Favourite” in late August.
“I’ve been so fortunate to work with great directors,” she told IndieWire in 2013. “In the end, I think that’s driving the conversation.”
Lanthimos added that Weisz reached out to him shortly after he heard from Blanchett — and as the cast of “The Favourite” proves, they weren’t the only actresses drawn to his work. “It was mostly women who reached out,” he said. “I don’t know what that says about my work, the work they were getting, or about male actors.” Regardless, he welcomed them into his domain. “It is true that the way the system works, you need name actors in order to put things together when you make English-language films,” he said. “I took great care in making sure that all these people reaching out wanted to be a part of it because of what the work was, not because something different might happen, and that they actually appreciated the work.”

Source

While promoting IWC watches in Shanghai last week, Cate gave this interview to Fashion Ifeng where she talks about female and male perspectives in fashion and in cinema.

We have also added magazine scans from Harper’s Bazaar Taiwan, i Look Magazine and Cine Premiere Mexico to our Gallery and a little behind the scenes picture from “The House with a Clock in Its Walls” set, published by Loop Weekly. Enjoy!

Rome Film Festival – Additional videos

Rome Film Festival  – Additional videos

Hello Everyone!

Today we are bringing more videos from “The House with a Clock in Its Walls” premiere at the Rome Film Festival from last friday. Enjoy!


Wirtschaft

Virgilio

Rai

Rai masterclass

SMTV san marino

Sky news


Rome Film Festival – Additional Content

Rome Film Festival – Additional Content

Hi everyone!

Cate attented four events during the 13th Rome Film Festival. Here are some new content related to this visit to Rome. Enjoy!!!

A margine dei suoi impegni per la presentazione de Il mistero della casa del tempo, la due volte premio Oscar Cate Blanchett ha partecipato a un incontro ravvicinato con il pubblico di RomaFF13.

Il primo film di cui ha parlato Cate Blanchett è stato Il curioso caso di Benjamin Button (David Fincher, 2008).
Mi sento romantica, soprattutto stasera. Ho accettato il film perché sono appassionata di tanti suoi elementi, come lo sceneggiatore Tim Roth, il regista David Fincher e Brad Pitt. Brad era così orrendo che è stato davvero difficile fingere di provare qualcosa per lui (ride, ndr)!. Il mio personaggio e le immagini mi hanno colpita, soprattutto l’ultima scena, con Daisy che guarda morire Benjamin, ormai diventato un infante. Tutte le madri sanno cosa si prova durante quella scena, perché pensano che prima o poi il figlio morirà e loro moriranno. Come ha detto Thomas Stearns Eliot, in my end is my beginning (nella mia fine è il mio principio), questo è il senso.

Il secondo film affrontato da Cate Blanchett è stato Carol (Todd Haynes, 2015)
Durante le attività stampa di Carol, mi sono sorpresa nel ricevere continuamente domande sulla mia sessualità, mentre per altri film non mi avevano mai fatto domande, per esempio, sulle mie capacità psichiche. In me ha suscitato una profonda sorpresa il fatto che il mio genere sessuale fosse improvvisamente diventato un argomento di cui discutere. Interpretare un ruolo secondo me significa creare un punto di vista universale su un personaggio, per cui il mio genere per me non è mai stato un problema, e non lo sarà finché non mi chiuderà una porta. Ci aspettiamo sempre di trovare affinità col personaggio, mentre per me la recitazione è antropologica, perché mi connetto con persone diverse da me e di epoche storiche diverse. Il grande piacere per me è capire cosa muove le persone, cosa le motiva.

Carol per me è stato come un parto d’amore. Avevo letto al liceo il romanzo, ma alcuni anni fa il progetto era molto più difficile, essendo incentrato su due donne lesbiche che non lo nascondevano negli anni ’50, però per fortuna da allora le cose sono cambiate. È stato comunque molto faticoso trovare produttori, ma queste difficoltà sono state un ulteriore incentivo per farlo.

Il successivo film affrontato da Cate Blanchett è stato Bandits (Barry Levinson, 2001), che ha stimolato una riflessione sulle differenze fra il cinema e il teatro
Quando ho iniziato a lavorare non mi sarei mai aspettata di arrivare al cinema. Mi dicevano che avevo 25 anni e che mi dovevo sbrigare perché stavo diventando vecchia. Per fortuna, le cose non funzionano più così. Ho fatto 2 film con la Fox, questo con Levinson e uno con Isabelle Huppert, che sarà su questo palco domani. Penso sia utile passare dal cinema al teatro, perché il teatro ti dà una percezione del pubblico. Uno aiuta l’altro. Il cinema mi ha invece portata a valutare le possibilità delle grandi inquadrature e dei primi piani. Se mi puntassero una pistola alla testa e mi costringessero a scegliere fra i due probabilmente sceglierei il teatro, perché c’è un rapporto visibile col tuo pubblico e perché è un lavoro di squadra.

Nei film, c’è un aspetto letterale, c’è un lavoro di narrativa sul personaggio che offre grande elasticità. Se a teatro vedi una schifezza non ci torni più, mentre al cinema ci vai lo stesso. A teatro però il pubblico è molto più coinvolto e ogni sera è un’esperienza diversa. Il film è un oggetto più compiuto in sé.

Cate Blanchett ha poi parlato di Diario di uno scandalo (Richard Eyre, 2006), nel quale ha lavorato accanto a un mostro sacro come Judi Dench
Judi è fantastica, e quando lavori con attrici di questo calibro il tuo lavoro acquista la qualità dell’altra persona. Quando fai un film che è tratto da un romanzo, non sempre la fedeltà al testo originale aiuta. La scena della lite, per esempio, l’abbiamo dovuta rigirare, e Judi aveva dietro di se una specie di tartaruga per darmi margine per spingerla. Lo sceneggiatore era sempre con noi, tutto è diventato molto fluido e provavamo e riprovavamo le battute. Vi racconto un aneddoto emblematico: a Judi piace molto lavorare a maglia; ha preparato una fodera per il cuscino per il regista Richard Eyre, e ci ha scritto sopra una sfilza di “fanculo”.

A seguire, è stato il turno di Io non sono qui (Todd Haynes, 2007), in cui Cate Blanchett ha interpretato Bob Dylan
L’idea di partenza per il film era quella di un’opera teatrale. Quando qualcuno ti fa una proposta così folle, devi assolutamente dire di sì. Solo pochi potrebbero rappresentare un personaggio in 6 parti con 6 attori diversi, ma tutti noi eravamo in questo viaggio e volevamo sapere dove ci avrebbe portato. Io stavo girando Elizabeth: The Golden Age, e se lo vedete noterete che continuavo a perdere peso per tutto il film, perché mi stavo preparando al ruolo che avrei dovuto fare. Adoro Bob Dylan, mentre lo studiavo ero totalmente presa da lui, ed è stato l’unica volta che mio marito è stato geloso. Non so se ha mai visto il film, io comunque non ci ho mai parlato.

Il successivo film affrontato da Cate Blanchett è stato Blue Jasmine (Woody Allen, 2013), grazie al quale ha ottenuto l’Oscar come migliore attrice protagonista
Penso che come avviene per molti registi sceneggiatori, la regia avviene attraverso il testo, per cui una grande sceneggiatura o testo teatrale contengono già molte informazioni, e a quel punto si tratta solo di fare gioco di squadra. Liv Ullmann era venuta in Australia per dirigere una versione teatrale di Un tram che si chiama Desiderio, in cui io avevo interpretato la protagonista Blanche. In seguito l’abbiamo portato in America, e credevo che Woody l’avesse visto, considerando le somiglianze fra le due opere. Quando gliel’ho chiesto, lui mi ha detto che non l’aveva visto e non voleva sentire parlare di Un tram che si chiama Desiderio. Il mio corpo conservava però qualcosa di quel ruolo e questo mi ha aiutata molto. Nel cinema non funziona molto l’eccesso di pensiero e c’è chi dice che le prove servono solo per riportare l’attore indietro all’atmosfera iniziale, che era già quella ottimale.

L’ultimo film da lei interpretato affrontato da Cate Blanchett è stato The Aviator (Martin Scorsese, 2004), grazie al quale ha conquistato l’Oscar come miglior attrice non protagonista nei panni di Katharine Hepburn
Sono cresciuta divorando i film con Katharine Hepburn e ammirando la strada che lei ha aperto alle donne al cinema. Stavo lavorando a The Missing di Ron Howard, e il mio agente mi ha chiamata dicendo che Martin Scorsese mi aveva cercata e mi avrebbe richiamata dopo mezz’ora. Io stavo accanto al telefono tremando, come se avessi il Parkinson. Non ricordo niente della chiamata, so solo di avere detto sì, entusiasta di lavorare con lui. Solo quando ho realizzato la difficoltà della parte mi sono spaventata.

Cate Blanchett ha poi scelto di mostrare al pubblico una scena di un film a cui lei non ha partecipato ma a cui tiene particolarmente, cioè La sera della prima (John Cassavetes, 1977)
Consiglio caldamente a chi non avesse visto questo film di vederlo, perché è straordinario. È la storia di un’attrice di Broadway che vede arrivare il suo tramonto. La recitazione e il ruolo di Gena Rowlands sono straordinari, perché riesce a entrare in quello spazio fra il ruolo e la persona che lo interpreta; ha una capacità straordinaria di creare l’emozione di una persona che si distrugge mentre crea un personaggio. È stata grande fonte di ispirazione per me.

In chiusura di incontro, Cate Blanchett si è prestata a un ultimo veloce gioco, ovvero associare una parola a 3 grandi registi con cui ha lavorato. A Martin Scorsese ha associato la parola ilare, mentre per Woody Allen ha scelto enigma. Steven Spielberg invece? La riposta è stata vorace.

Source

Cate Blanchett brinda a champagne nella Coppa Volpi – Read Article Here